Women are reassurance addicts

vendingmachine

The latest research I have conducted with Syracuse university
highlights some interesting findings. Whilst most younger women
under the age of 21 feel comfortable with technology and rate
themselves at 6 out of 10 on a tech literate scale, they are not
confident to buy technology without seeking reassurance from others.
They will rely heavily on the advice of either the sales assistant or
a friend.

Women want to know they have made the right decision when they buy technology. They want to see the product. Touch it, feel it, imagine using it. Is it going to enhance my life? How does it fit into my life?

Men do not rate themselves much higher than women, 7 out of 10 on the
tech literate scale but do not need any reassurance at point of
purchase. They are more likely to have researched products online and
checked out online reviews. Men are willing to take a gamble. They more likely to take risks when it comes to technology.

The process is completely different both in terms of perception and
behaviour. Yet tech brands know nothing about these gender
differences and neither do they spend any time conducting ‘decent’ research.

Tech brands support a very male and traditional buying process. A great emphasis is placed on traditional review sites such as CNET and IGN. These sites are almost exclusively read by men.

Currently the retail experience supports what men
want: a transaction. Stores like Game and Dixons continue to be a “vending machine” which relies on you knowing and be confident about
what you want. Rather than provide encouragement and expertise, the
sales assistants try to flog you a certain game or piece of kit that
only increases need for reassurance. And I wont even mention PC World
as I will come out in an allergic rash. I need therapy to get over
the ‘experience’ of trying to buy a hard drive there.

Tech retailers must create a culture of reassurance which is present in the attitude of the staff and the way women buy.

Forget the Genius Bar, bring in the Reassurance Bar where you can sit and have coffee with a member of staff. Have a Try Before you Buy section where you can see your kit in action. Make the stores feel like women’s ideal
home, not their idea of hell.

And last but not least, recognise that men and women are different in their wants and desires from technology.

Inclusivity in Technology Advertising and the Effects of the Dot.com Crisis

The current economic crisis has raised many questions in regards to whether it fosters or harms gender inclusivity. Recent reports seem to suggest that it harms rather than helps the diversity and inclusivity agenda. However what can we learn from previous downturns?

The technology industry faced a crisis after the dot.com bubble burst. Sarah Dempsey, whose article ‘The Increasing Technology Divide - Persistent portrayals of maverick masculinity in US marketing’ was interested in what happens to gender inclusivity in times of crisis. She studied advertisements in Wired, the flagship magazine of the technical revolution, in 2000 and 2006.

Prior to the year 2000 the assumption was that the digital revolution is leading to an egalitarian lifestyle where everyone regardless of gender, race or ability could enjoy the newly found freedoms of technology. However by 2006 the industry had gone through the dot.com bust.

Sarah Dempsey’s detailed study of advertising in Wired in 2000 found three portrayals. First, men were seen as the main consumers of technology and women were mainly used as objects. Second, in an attempt to attract a wider audience more ‘Average Joes’ appeared in the adverts. Finally, technology was portrayed as empowering for men and women but the portrayals followed strict gender guidelines. Men were empowered as users of technology though maverick figures that resisted the mainstream. Women were empowered through technology through ‘damsel in distress’ narratives. Here a victimized woman would be rescued by technology.

How did these portrayals change in the year 2006? In the year 2006 the adverts were dominated by nerds and geeks. This supports the ideal of the masculine maverick figures. In contrast to the 2000 adverts, women were less likely to be used as objects. This might be related to the fact that many companies became increasingly aware of stereotypical gender portrayals of women. However the research found that overall, technology adverts were much less inclusive in 2006 than in 2000. Many more adverts were targeted at the white, male consumer. This research indicates that in a crisis, people tend to convert back to mainstream thinking leading to less diverse and inclusive gender portrayals. 

This clearly shows that advertising portrayals of men and women engaging with technology have to change. Women need to be seen in active roles as users and creators of technology. We also need to see more variety in the portrayals of men. Instead of just confirming the tired cliché of the masculine maverick, men have to be shown in relevant contemporary situations which allow men with different background to identify with them. The media plays a crucial role in shaping our views of the world and it is therefore crucially important that there are realistic yet aspirational role models for women and indeed men in technology that are displayed in leading magazines like Wired. Particularly in a crisis.

 

Cultural anthropology - how it can make your tech better

intel-francoise-bourdonnec-11

 

Francoise Bourdonnec, a cultural anthropologist, is director of the home experience research team in Intel’s digital home group and her team consists of social scientists and quant researchers, whose job is to “see the world through other people’s eyes” to understand better what people want from their technology. What a great job – talking to people and finding out how to improve tech for their day to day lives. I spoke to her to find out what she does day-to-day and how she thinks women are being targeted as technology consumers in the 21st century.

 

Francoise, tell me about how you learn more about what consumers are after?

By doing fieldwork, which includes visiting homes around the world, spending time with families to understand how they think about technologies and their homes, encouraging participant observation and design experiments, and bring that information back to Intel to deepen the corporation’s understanding of consumers - how they live, what matters to them and to understand how technologies are used, understood and imagined around the world. We then work with Digital Home Group to define the experiences and technologies that will fit into people’s cultural/social values and practices.

 

How did you come to be a cultural anthropologist?

This is actually a second career for me.  I had an interest in anthropology during college, but made a career in operations at Intel. I decided to go back to grad school for an anthropology degree when I realized that anthropology was a way for us to do a better job of targeting technology to consumers…not just improving products ‘for technology’s sake’ but to ensure that the improvements resulted in better, easier to use products. As luck would have it, that is when Intel expanded its hiring of social scientists (there had been social scientists at Intel for about 10 years in the labs) as product groups decided that anthropologists and other social scientists could help create better products. So for me, it was a great opportunity to keep working at Intel and put these new skills to work – and it has been a great experience.

 

What stands out in your findings during your time at Intel?

I work in the Digital Home Group – which focuses on interactive television, so much of our research has been focused on understanding how people view televisions and internet technologies. The thing that surprised me most was how much people around the world LOVE their televisions: they are part of the family, they are omnipresent, they have many functions (entertainment, distraction, reward) and they are dearly loved. TVs are often the only ‘acceptable’ technology for social areas like the living room. When we started this research, we thought the focus on TV might be stronger in the US – but that has not been the case: our record for TVs in a home was in the UK – 11 TVs in 1100 square feet. They weren’t all plugged in, but still… We have seen them in every room in a house. And our challenge is to make sure that as we add interactivity to the TV, we don’t break the experience that people love so much. 

 

What do you think of the way technology is targeted at women? Is it changing?

I absolutely think it is changing. First, there is a recognition that women are interested in technology on a par with men – it’s not just a “guy thing”. They own as much technology as men and they are increasing influences in consumer electronics, gaming, social networking and internet use. When you add to that women’s growing earning power and their role in purchase decisions (the Consumer Electronics Association estimates that women influence 60+ per cent of consumer electronics purchases and, especially in emerging markets, they are often the majority of decision maker for purchases such as televisions, media players, DVD/cameras…) - they are absolutely a key target for technology manufacturers. Especially since - at least in the US -  women spend about 20 per cent less than men on consumer electronics products – and they are 25 per cent less likely to consider such products ‘good value for money,’ according to the Consumer Electronics Association.

 

So there’s a greater focus on understanding what women want from technology – and responding to it. This can be anything from ergonomics to women’s approach to technology (grounded in multitasking – women want technology to do its job well, to work reliably, to be easy to set up and to not need debugging!) to where technology is sold (traditional tech stores are perceived as very unfriendly by most women). So we see efforts like Sony’s successful digital cameras targeted at women, stores created to appeal to women, and products that deliver on their promise with minimal effort (and that make it clear what it is they do). That means a good out-of-the-box experience and intuitive user interfaces – and sales support (often online, since when shopping women gather more information than men) to help make a good decision.

We’re also seeing more attention paid to technology style – and no, that doesn’t mean pink: women like black and silver technology too! But it does mean that tech products have to look good and be ‘customizable’ to their owners’ style.

 

I’d like to point out that while many of these things are important to women - men benefit from them too. So I suspect solving the problem for women will make for happier consumers overall (think Oxo goodgrips – made to address grip issues, and comfortable for everyone). Do I think manufacturers are there yet? Not quite….but they are definitely making progress.

 

There is a growing awareness of the importance of women as consumers. That means that companies are focusing on ensuring that women are represented in consumer groups giving feedback during the development process, and are doing a better job of targeting the issues that women care about in advertising their products.  Women tend to care less about technical specs and more about whether technology will get the job done, and they are much less willing than men to ‘de-bug’ technology to make it work. So ensuring that products are easy to set up and use, and communicating what products do rather than what they are becomes key. For example, a site like www.my-laptop.co.uk that helps women figure out what technology will do what they want is much more targeted – and helpful – than a spec sheet.  And we now see technology advertising in a wider range of media, and showcasing women as users – while demonstrating what the technology enables (so a camera is not about the lens, it’s about preserving memories).

 

So there you have it - women want targeted, well designed technology that is straightforward to operate, does the job and isn’t pink. Thanks for your time Francoise.

Carrotmob anyone?

People come to together in a time of crisis. The Internet is enabling the spirit of mutuality but more interestingly the recession is driving people towards collective buying.  A strategy that people have little time for when the economy is good. In harsher times collective buying could turn tables on companies who are seen to be greedy.

Last week’s Economist describes how the residents of the San Francisco have been signing up enthusiastically for a new green energy campaign called 1BOG- short for “One Block off the Grid”. It asks homeowners to switch solar energy one block at a time by organising them into buying-clubs. The more people who sign up, at any time the bigger the discounts. Finally the contract to supply, install and maintain the system is put out to tender the “Carrotmob” outsources the work to the most competitive bidder.

Marketers have long harped on about the shift of power moving from the company to the consumer, but it’s not actually happened until now in any great measure (with the exception of a few groups on Facebook).  The fact remains that the majority of technology companies are still interested in what interests them rather than what interests their customers.

So many women tell me that technology is “way to complicated” “designed by men for men” “lacks any intuition” “is frustrating and dull.”

Imagine another world, where women Carrotmob for intuitive and sexy technology.  Technology that was made with women in mind.  Where substantial numbers of women gather together and say what they want. Where ten-thousand women were to draw up a list of their ideal next phone/TV/PVR/console and pledge to buy it. Where tech brands bid to build and support this product knowing that they had guaranteed buyers, and in return women would have to honor their contract.

It’s about time we carrotmobbed for intuitive, human technology that reflects what we are interested in.

What would your ideal phone/TV/PVR/console/piece of kit look like?  How would it feel using it?  How would it be different from whats out there now?

Digital Mom

Marketers seem to have finally come around to see that mothers use the Web 2.0. The insightful report called Digital Mom was produced by Razorfish and CafeMom.

 

digital mom

The first part of the report is based on a survey with 1,500 mothers who are users of Web 2.0. The report produced some interesting findings:

1.    65% of mums use social networking sites, 56% SMS and 52% game online or via a game console. This is for me the most striking finding showing that gaming is no longer a niche activity for adolescent boys but has gone mainstream.

2.    There are also age differences. Moms over 35  are more likely to use the web as an information tool while moms under 35 are more likely to use social network sites. Also women with children over 12 tend to game more (57%) than women with children under 12 (51%).

3.    The mothers’ interests go beyond parenting. These women retain many interests. In the last three months the surveyed mothers had researched or purchases fashion items or clothing (40%), food and cooking (31%) and baby/parenting (26%), banking (22%), computer and electronics (21%) and medication/medical condition (20%).

Part 2 is based on an in-depth survey of 1,750 women active in CafeMum.

4.    Digitalmoms spent 18.5 hours per week online.

5.    These mums are active in social networking sites not passive consumers.

6.    The report develops five segments of digital mums: the self-expressor, the utility mum, the groupster, the infoseeker and the hyperconnector.

Marketers seems to have discovered that mums online a worthwhile target group. I wonder when we will see the Digital Dad.

Tech Porn is dead

This is the 21st century right?. I pick up the T3 2009 calendar and can’t believe what I am seeing. I check it is 2009 and I have not found a vintage copy of the 1979 edition. Each month has a gadget of the month with a erotic shot of a girl ‘wet’ with excitement holding a strategically placed gadget in her legs, arms, breasts. January we have a woman with a see through slip on in water holding an android phone. February we have a women kneeling in hot steam holding an ‘eco gadget’. March shows us a women with a touchscreen strategically placed in her bikini. Do I need to go on?

image2_reduced

In my previous post, I demonstrated that women are a growth market while male markets are saturated. Marketers missing out on a £5billion pot of gold (a conservative figure according to Jupiter), I predict T3 will be out of business in a year. Their magazine relies on its core audience of “sexually repressed nerds” according to Wikipedia. All of whom have the skills to download real porn from bit torrent and don’t need this half-hearted house tech-porn.

Showing the calendar to some male colleagues, one told me the only place he could see the calendar was “on the wall of kwik fit”. Hardly an aspirational image for your average man with disposable cash. If you are trying to woo a girl, and she walks into your bedroom and see a copy of T3 or worse, the T3 2009 calendar, what sort of signal does that send? Even a sexually repressed nerd can think that one through. Some of the advertising in T3 is no better, this Asus ad being a good example.

asus

Rather than default to a out of date, lazy way of selling technology to men at the expense of attracting women, technology brands need to be more innovative with their media strategies. Technology has become so accessible and embedded into our culture, that the hard sell of technology is no longer needed. There is no such thing as Early Adopters.

Tech brands need to think innovatively about to communicate to both men and women and buying a media strategy of tech porn like T3 just ain’t going to cut it. What brands need to do:

1. Leverage the blogging community as they are the key influencers. Panasonic are doing this at CES. Who are you more like to trust for a product review- a blogger or a paid for reviewer?

2. Connecting your audience to like minded people is a great way to earn their respect and ultimately their trust. Hewlett Packard used ‘brandalists’- legal grafitti artists to get their HYPE message across and generated so much positive WoM.

3. Be brave. Be rebellious. And dont waste money on advertising in magazines like T3. Goodbye T3 and Good Luck.

Designed by Women for Everyone

Belinda mentioned in one of her recent posts that the consumer tech industry is now at a stage the car industry inhabited many years ago. Many car manufacturers have indeed started to take women as consumers seriously. For a long time, most cars are implicitly or explicitly designed for men and by men.

car-by-women1

At London Business School, I have conducted some research with Volvo. A group of women at Volvo thought it was about time to show the world what a car designed by women may look like. This produced the first concept car designed by an all women team to provide the world with a practical example of how women would design a car. The car was presented in 2004, but there are some valuable lessons to learn here.

The task was to design a car that would not be futuristic but realistic in terms of the needs of women as well as men. Their research has indicated that in the premium car segment women are the hardest group to please and building a car that meets their expectations also means to build a car that will please men.

The team conducted an external and internal study to explore what women want in cars. The central idea about the project was to ask questions in a different way.

Research found for instance that women like an easy to park car not because they cannot park but because they park a car much more often during a day.

The team also challenged the idea that cars are designed with men in mind fitting their bodily features much better than those of women.

The concept car was very innovative because the team re-thought fundamentals of car design such as where the hand breaks or the washer fluid were situated or how the doors should open.

In addition a new concept of headrests was introduced allowing people with ponytails to sit comfortably and the layout of the car was a 2 by 2 version with the rear two seats being moved in slightly to allow the driver to see the rear passengers.

The team wanted to create a car that felt more like a living room and decided to include having movable cushions and different fabrics for the upholstery of seats.

Although it was never intended to be built, the concept car provided a lot of thought provoking ideas which influenced the design of other cars. Tasking women’s perspectives into consideration challenged how things had always been done. The result was a concept car that was built by women for everyone. 

Where Computing is Not for Men

In most Western countries studying computing has long been seen as a male endeavor. However this is not the case across the world. Vivian Lagesen’s research in fact shows that in Malaysia computer science is populated by women. In her summary report for Women-nomics, she stresses that in Malaysia computing is not seen as masculine but instead a good employment for women. In fact, faculty in computing degrees is often female. There are perceived to be plenty of jobs in computing and the office environment of IT jobs is seen as safe.  Vivian’s research shows how flexible the social construction of computing can be. 

The laptop that thinks it’s a handbag

Vivenne Tam HP digital clutch

Vivenne Tam HP digital clutch

 It’s a tough decision, right? You want to take your laptop out with you but - horrors! - it’s dingy, metallic and it doesn’t match your frock. But never fear, here’s ‘the world’s first digital clutch’, an innovation from HP that looks set to end the war between computing and looking stylish. Or at least that seems to be what the aim of this pretty but perplexing product is.

Good-looking gadgets are great - no one wants to tote devices that look as though they were crafted from Bakelite by a short-sighted Aeroflot engineer. But fashion designers and technology can be uncomfortable bedfellows - LG’s first Prada phone looked fabulous but it proved to be an abomination if you actually wanted to send a text or make a call. Armani and Dolce & Gabbana have also launched themselves at the mobile market without making much of an impact. And last time I looked, cutting-edge laptops looked pretty good to me - understated, shiny and nice and computer-y. Surely a designer clad-computer is simply a case of gilding the lily?

More annoying still is the idea that women can be coaxed into buying tech by making it pink and flowery. When the ‘high fashion meets high tech’ HP Mini 1000 Vivienne Tam edition was announced at New York fashion week back in September, no specs were available, but more attention was paid to its hue - ”The HP Mini coordinates perfectly with stunning Vivienne Tam pieces!” gushed the promotional material. Thank god it matched - how embarrassing would it be if there’d been a clash??

But perhaps I’ve been broken by too may press releases trumpeting technology for ‘the ladies’ that are illustrated by average gadgets updated with nothing more than a rosy tint. I asked my female colleagues what they thought about the digital clutch. Two thought that while it looked quite cool, they’d rather buy a laptop that could fit into their handbag rather than investing in something that’s trying to look like one. Another work mate liked it, but thought she’d quickly get bored with it while another simply rolled her eyes and dubbed it patronising.

The digital clutch, which is actually a great mini laptop is available now, though, like all so many other over-hyped designer tie-ins, it’s limited edition so if you’re in the market for a machine that’s al la mode, get your order in now. Suffice to say that I won’t be picking one up to go with my peony-print party dress - I’ll stick to a nice Macbook or Asus instead.

Goodbye Men, Hello Ladies

Jerry yang, Yahoo’s ex chief exec announced that the advertising industry was facing the toughest downturn in decades. The age of extravagance is gone. The age of the hangover is here. No more big marketing budgets with money to trial and test cool ideas. Its about ROI. Its about bold, strong brands having a clear positioning. Tough times need solid, focused leadership, a lesson that Woolworths learnt the hard way.

Napoleon declared the essence of strategy is sacrifice. Never has this been more true than in the current climate. And the sacrifice should be allocating marketing spend to men- a well saturated market. Lad’s mags are already pregnant with tech-brands competing for their attention. Women are the financial opportunity and Jupiter estimate marketers are missing out on £0.5billion by not marketing to women.

Out of every 10 gadgets, 4 are bought by women. And no before you ask we are not talking about fridges and washing machines. More women than men play games between the age of 24-35 than men now And we are not just talking the Sims. World of Warcraft now has 50% female players.

The research I conducted with Jupiter highlighted (now Forrester), ownership is on a par with men in most categories. Couple that with the fastest growing segment on social networks is married women with children. And according to an N-vision survey, December 2008, approx 40% of women are transacting on the Internet (ie spending money rather than just using the Internet for communication, information and entertainment) compared to 30% of men. Hence, Women are no longer a niche audience - they are the budget-holders and drivers of growth.

women-are-no-longer-a-niche-market1

The editor of marie claire is right when she says:

“When it comes to tech brands and women, technology companies are in the same place the cars industry was 20 years ago.”

With the exception of Nintendo and it’s Wii, Apple, no other brand is talking the female language. I agree with Hilary Chilura when she says:

“Like nervous teenage boys at a junior high-school dance, tech marketers haven’t figured out how to talk to women”.

Ask any family who was in charge of buying the Christmas gifts, and you’ll find out its women not men. Women are not only buying technology for themselves, but as the Chief Household Officer, are buying for kids, husband, gran and friends. Women are in charge of the house, but more importantly are in charge of the living room (see Battle for the Living Room) where many of the technology lives: PVR, console, HD TV…. In my house, its my husband who lives in ‘his’ world but its me who lives in the ‘real’ world. I am deciding what we should cut back on, how much we can save and what we will buy when it comes to technology.

If tech brands want to be successful, they should focus on women at the expense of men. Women are no longer ‘the Second Sex. ‘ Rather the most profitable sex.